Tax Simplification
"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the
propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and
tyrannical...A wise and frugal government...shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned...Congress has not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare but only those specifically enumerated...
Would it not be better to simplify the system of taxation rather than
to spread it over such a variety of subjects and pass through so many
new hands?"
Thomas Jefferson
It has become apparent that our "Do as we say not as we do" Congress
never studied the history of our American Revolution. Nor have they
apparently read or if they have understood our Constitution, to which
they take an oath to uphold. We are once again faced with oppressive
taxes with more to come and no representation. The
time has now come to shred the 60,000 plus page monstrosity known to us as
the tax code. Following are the (2) most favored solutions along with
the pros and cons of each. Remember, our current tax code as it stands
is just another part of "Redistribution of Wealth."
One more time we will point out that neither the Democrats nor
Republicans have acted to change this. They ALL like spending our money
too much!
"FREE CHOICE FLAT TAX"
The "free choice flat tax" option would apply one single tax rate of
17% to all individual and corporate taxpayers. It would also include a
standard exemption of $13,200 for each adult ($26,400 for a married
couple) and a $4,000 exemption for each child or dependent. The current
$1,000 tax credit for each child age sixteen or younger would also
apply, as would the current earned income tax credit (EITC.) This would
mean no federal income tax on the first $46,165 in income for a family
of four.
The "flat tax" option eliminates all loopholes
that could allow higher- income people to avoid paying taxes. But the
personal exemptions, the child tax credit, and the EITC would free 42%
of taxpayers all low income and moderate income households from paying
federal income. Many tax filers would receive net tax rebates from the
EITC.
The "flat tax" would eliminate the "death tax,"
"capital gains tax," and the "alternative minimum tax." There would be
no tax on retirement benefits or on social security benefits. There
would be no tax on dividends because corporations would have already
paid tax on that income at the corporate level.
The "flat
tax" option would require just one form on one sheet of paper. In a
nutshell this option is called "free choice" because it would allow
individuals and corporations to pick the "flat tax" or still file under
the current ridiculously complex tax system. Many would actually pay a
little more in taxes in return for CERTAINITY AND SIMPLICITY.
Most feel they would save so much money in record keeping and
compliance, which costs are estimated at $200 Billion a year, that they
are thrilled by the optional flat tax.
The "Free Choice Flat Tax" could be adopted immediately by Congress at little risk to the taxpayer or the government. (Source- "Real Change" Newt Gingrich)
"THE FAIR TAX"
I personally like the "fair tax" idea; however it does have some
challenges. First the good things. The "fair tax" would for the most
part eliminate the IRS and replace (income tax) with a (national sales
tax/ consumption tax.) There are varying opinions as to what the actual
percentage should be, probably anywhere from 25%-35%. We would be on a
fairer playing field in regard to the world market. My favorite part
is; NO ONE escapes paying their "fair" share of taxes including illegal
entities such as, drug dealers, prostitutes, bookies, loan sharks, etc.
No more "redistribution of wealth" everyone pays! And no more
"loopholes."
Now the challenges: 1.) People must learn how their personal spending habits would be affected. I personally don't see this as a bad thing.
Americans would have to be convinced that they gain more from
abolishing the income tax and social security tax than they lose in the
consumption tax. 2.) We would have to amend the Constitution to remove
the right to impose a personal income tax. We would NEVER want Congress
to have an ability to tax both our incomes and our spending. Amending our Constitution is no easy task and would have to have the full force of "we the people" behind it.
3.) Enforcement is required, because people will always be tempted to
find a way not to pay. What would still be left of the IRS would be
looking at every business as an indirect tax collector on every sale.
However many states in their own way (currently nine of them) already
have somewhat of a "fair tax" approach. Tennessee being one of them and
along with the other eight has no state income tax. We pay a higher
sales tax rate. All nine of these states experience higher economic
growth and more rapid growth in jobs. (Some sourcing, "Real Change" Newt Gingrich) More recently there is the idea of an across the board Flat Tax. The
percentage is debatable, something between 10%-13%. This would be an
EVERYBODY pays into the system. In other words a person makes
$33,000 a year at say 10% $3,300 gets sent into the IRS. One piece of
paper. No more deductions and mounds of paperwork. (This is my personal favorite.) (Of
course simply repealing the 16th. amendment would enable us to have no
need for any of the above). However good luck! With the greedy
politicians we currently have in Congress getting that accomplished!
I
sincerely suggest that each and every one of you do more homework on
these, as we only touched on them. With one cautionary note however, be
careful where you look for information. We must and just as
importantly, hold our city, county, and state representatives in check
with oppressive taxing they are so often equally guilty of. One thing
we can all agree on, our current oppressive system of taxation must
come to an end. As we will state ad-nauseum, if we do not get
spending under control in Washington and hold our Congress ACCOUNTABLE
for every penny, no amount of solutions will work!
|